SQLite MCP Server
SQLite MCP サーバー
標準化されたインターフェースを通じて SQLite データベース操作を提供するモデル コンテキスト プロトコル (MCP) サーバー。
特徴
インメモリ SQLite データベース (ファイルベースのストレージ用に構成可能)
SQL 操作 (SELECT、INSERT、UPDATE、DELETE)
テーブル管理(CREATE、LIST、DESCRIBE)
ビジネスインサイトメモ追跡
簡単に導入できるDockerサポート
Related MCP server: SQLite MCP Server
開発と展開
地域開発
# Install dependencies and build
npm install
npm startDocker デプロイメント
# Build and run with Docker
docker build -t sqlite-mcp-server .
docker run -d --name sqlite-mcp sqlite-mcp-serverNixpacks の展開
アプリケーションは、Railway、Coolify、Render などのプラットフォームで Nixpacks を使用して簡単にデプロイできます。
# Deploy with Nixpacks
nixpacks build . --name sqlite-mcp-serverプロジェクトには Dockerfile が含まれているため、追加の構成は必要ありません。
利用可能なツール
read_query: SELECTクエリを実行するwrite_query: INSERT、UPDATE、または DELETE クエリを実行するcreate_table: 新しいテーブルを作成するlist_tables: データベース内のすべてのテーブルを一覧表示するdescribe_table: テーブルのスキーマ情報を表示するappend_insight: メモにビジネスインサイトを追加する
リモートサーバー接続
n8n で SSE を使用して接続するには:
MCPクライアントノードを追加する
SSE 接続を構成します。
SSE URL:
http://localhost:3000/sseメッセージ投稿エンドポイント:
http://localhost:3000/messages追加のヘッダーは不要
使用例
// Create a table
await callTool('create_table', {
query: 'CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT)'
});
// Insert data
await callTool('write_query', {
query: 'INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES ("John Doe")'
});
// Query data
const result = await callTool('read_query', {
query: 'SELECT * FROM users'
});環境変数
デフォルトでは必要ありません。ファイルベースのストレージを使用する場合は、 src/index.tsのデータベースパスを変更してください。
貢献
リポジトリをフォークする
機能ブランチを作成します(
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)変更をコミットします (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature')ブランチにプッシュする (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)プルリクエストを開く
ライセンス
ISC
Available Tools
1 toolcreate_tableB
Create a new table in the database with a full CREATE TABLE SQL statement.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | CREATE TABLE SQL statement |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention side effects (e.g., if table exists), permission requirements, or that it modifies state, which is critical for a write operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence with no wasted words, though minor expansion for behavioral details would improve it without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential purpose but lacks details on error handling, permission requirements, or SQL dialect support.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the 'query' parameter fully. The description adds the word 'full', implying a complete statement, but no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'create', the resource 'table', and specifies it uses a full CREATE TABLE SQL statement, effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools like drop_table or list_tables.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for creating a table but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like write_query, nor when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
6 tool updates
v1.1.0- Removed
append_insight - Removed
describe_table - Removed
drop_table - Removed
list_tables - Removed
read_query - Removed
write_query
7 tool updates
- Added
append_insight - Added
create_table - Added
describe_table - Added
drop_table - Added
list_tables - Added
read_query - Added
write_query
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly distinct by default.
With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained. The name 'create_table' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.
A single tool for a SQLite server is far too few for the apparent scope. Typical database operations are missing, making the tool set feel extremely thin.
The server only supports table creation, lacking essential operations like querying, inserting, updating, deleting, or dropping tables. This represents significant gaps for any database interaction.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Selise Blocks Cloud integration
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Model Context Protocol server for Studex tools, notifications, and profile integrations
A Model Context Protocol server for Wix AI tools
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for connecting to and interacting with various database systems (SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, SQL Server) through a unified interface.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to execute SQL queries and interact with SQLite databases through a structured interface.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows users to store, retrieve, update, and delete memories using SQLite storage.510MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with SQLite databases by connecting to database files, listing tables, describing schemas, and executing queries.61882MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/isaacgounton/sqlite-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server