get_analysis_design

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description must disclose behavior. It states that the tool returns the full design as a dict and returns an error dict if not found, which covers the main behavioral traits. It does not discuss permissions, rate limits, or side effects, but for a retrieval operation the disclosed behavior is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler. It is front-loaded with the verb and resource, and every word contributes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (one parameter, no nested objects) and the presence of an output schema, the description is complete for a simple getter. It covers purpose, parameter role, and return behavior, making it sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides parameter name and type, with 0% description coverage. The description's phrase 'by ID' maps directly to design_id and clarifies its role, but it does not provide additional format or source information. Since the parameter is self-explanatory from the name, the description adds minimal but adequate meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Retrieve' and clearly identifies the resource ('an analysis design') and the lookup mechanism ('by ID'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_analysis_design, update_analysis_design, and list_analysis_designs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a specific design ID, but it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusion criteria. It does not reference list_analysis_designs for browsing or clarify when not to use this tool. The 'by ID' phrase gives some context, but there is no explicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.