io.github.ethanhamilthon/yenflow
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.ethanhamilthon/yenflow
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents control Google Flow for generating images and videos using the user's own Google account. It provides tools for image generation, video creation, character and scene management, and UI discovery.171MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to control Google Flow for image and video generation using your own Google account.59 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate professional storyboards and videos from scripts or creative descriptions via MCP-compatible clients.20 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to programmatically generate images and videos through the authenticated Google Flow web interface via a direct Chrome DevTools Protocol connection, exposing tools for media generation, project management, status checks, and asset downloads without requiring official API keys.271MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDrives Google Flow from an agent or the terminal: Veo text-to-video, image-to-video and clip extension, plus Imagen image generation. Runs locally against your own Google account with Flow access; video generation bills that account's credits.161,912 PyPI215MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceControls Google Flow for image and video generation from an AI agent. Enables generating images with models like Imagen 4, creating videos, managing characters and scenes via browser automation.1759 npm68MIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Several tools are exact aliases (yenflow_* for flow_*), creating duplicate entries that an agent must disambiguate. More importantly, gflow_generate_video, flow_generate_scene, and flow_submit_scene all cover video generation but with unclear boundaries, making misselection likely.
Names are mostly snake_case but mix three prefixes—gflow_, flow_, and yenflow_ aliases—without a clear rule. Verb usage is also uneven: 'rm' instead of 'remove', 'get_credits' vs 'list_*', and 'plan_batch'/'submit_scene'/'generate_scene' follow different patterns.
Twenty-five tool names is too many, and five are exact aliases, inflating the count to 25 while only representing about 20 distinct operations. The surface feels heavier than needed, especially with six instruction-card tools and three scene-generation variants.
The set covers a broad workflow: auth, credits, projects, characters, instruction cards, image/video generation, scene planning/submission/polling, and stitching. However, character creation/update/delete is absent despite character voice and listing tools, and batch planning has no accompanying batch submission tool, creating notable workflow gaps.