F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI agents to manage projects, tasks, and schedules in JJ Planner through CRUD operations.
83 npm
-
JPI MCP Server
by etep82
Related Servers
Alternatives to JPI MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Planka projects, boards, lists, cards, tasks, labels, comments, stopwatches, and memberships through MCP tools.56-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage ClickUp workspaces, teams, spaces, folders, lists, tasks, and custom fields via 29 MCP tools with full CRUD operations.40 npm5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks with full lifecycle support including due dates, priorities, tags, subtasks, and project lists via 19 SQLite-backed MCP tools.4-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for AI assistants to interact with JIRA APIs, enabling them to read, create, update, and manage JIRA issues through standardized MCP tools.619 npm3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI models to interact with a self-hosted Plane workspace through MCP tools, supporting task, project, cycle, and module management.-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 69 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The tools are well-differentiated by resource type (component, job, template, resource) and action (add, create, delete, get, list, update), with clear boundaries. However, some overlap exists between 'add' and 'create' operations (e.g., jpi_add_task vs. jpi_create_tasks_cross_jobs), which could cause minor confusion, but descriptions help clarify their distinct contexts.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern with the 'jpi_' prefix throughout. Verbs like add, create, delete, get, list, and update are used predictably, and naming conventions (snake_case) are uniform across all 69 tools, making the set easy to navigate and understand.
Tool Count2/5
With 69 tools, the count is excessive for typical MCP server purposes, leading to potential cognitive overload and inefficiency. While the domain (job planning and integration) is complex, the tool surface could be streamlined by reducing redundancy (e.g., multiple batch operations) without losing functionality.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD/lifecycle coverage for all core resources (components, jobs, templates, resources, categories, groups), including batch operations and settings management. No obvious gaps exist; agents can perform full workflows from creation to deletion with detailed querying and updates.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues