select_weather_forecast_city_israel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool waits for loading, but does not explain error states (e.g., no autocomplete, failed navigation) or whether the action is blocking. Partial disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the verb 'Select', and includes an alternative action ('or press Enter'). No wasted words; concise and direct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple UI interaction with no parameters, the description covers the core behavior. It lacks details on return value (though output schema exists) and prerequisites, but is functionally complete for its scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter-specific info, but none is needed. It does mention 'first autocomplete result,' which is a behavioral constant, not a parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Select the first autocomplete result (or press Enter) and wait for forecast page to load.' This distinguishes it from sibling tools (open, enter, extract) by specifying the exact UI step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool follows a search action (likely sibling enter_weather_search_israel), but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or what conditions must be met (e.g., autocomplete must be visible). Usage context is vague.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.