OmniFocus MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to OmniFocus MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI assistants to query and manage OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags on macOS.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI assistants full control over OmniFocus on macOS, including tasks, projects, tags, folders, perspectives, forecast, notifications, and review workflows.42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server connecting OmniFocus to AI assistants, enabling task and project management via natural language.6253MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides full read/write access to OmniFocus, enabling AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, folders, tags, and perspectives via 51 tools, resources, and prompts.511620MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with OmniFocus to enable Claude (or other MCP-compatible AI assistants) to interact with your tasks and projects.7253240MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that exposes OmniFocus as structured task infrastructure for AI agents, enabling read, write, and filter operations on tasks and projects via natural language.6-
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools target distinct resource-action pairs, but there is overlap between general update tools and dedicated note update tools (e.g., omnifocus_update_task vs omnifocus_update_task_note), which could confuse an agent deciding which to use.
All tools follow a consistent omnifocus_verb_noun pattern with clear verbs (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, etc.) and consistent prepositions (add_tag_to_task, remove_tag_from_task), making the naming predictable and easy to navigate.
31 tools is on the higher side, but the number is justified by the comprehensive feature set of OmniFocus (tasks, projects, folders, tags, perspectives, reviews, batch operations). A small reduction by merging note update tools would improve conciseness.
The surface covers most CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders, including tagging and review. However, missing tag creation and a general 'list all tasks' tool are notable gaps that may cause agent failures.