Skip to main content
Glama
es3154

Turf-MCP

by es3154

Related Servers

Alternatives to Turf-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides geographic coordinate geometry tools for computing midpoints, centroids, bounding boxes, and point-in-bbox tests, enabling spatial calculations via natural language queries.
      132 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform geospatial analysis, spatial data processing, vector and raster operations, coordinate transformations, spatial statistics, mapping, and access to climate, satellite, and other geospatial data through MCP-compatible clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables natural language and geospatial queries on PostGIS databases, with 32 tools for spatial analysis, geometry operations, and database management.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Machine-native GIS processing API for AI agents and developers. Convert, reproject, validate, repair, buffer, clip, dissolve, and tile vector geodata across 25 endpoints. Pay-per-use USDC on Solana Mainnet ($0.01/op). No accounts, no API keys. Remote MCP SSE.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 113 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The tools are well-organized into categories (aggregation, booleans, measurement, etc.), and within each category, tools target specific geometric operations or algorithms. Descriptions are detailed and differentiate between similar tools (e.g., DBSCAN vs. K-means clustering, various boolean operations).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent snake_case pattern with clear category prefixes (e.g., aggregation_clustersDbscan, booleans_booleanContains, measurement_area). The naming is predictable and readable throughout all 113 tools, with no mixing of conventions or chaotic variations.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 113 tools, the count is excessive for a single server's scope, even for a comprehensive geospatial library. This many tools can overwhelm agents and make discovery difficult. While the domain (Turf.js geospatial operations) is broad, a more modular approach with fewer, more generalized tools would be more appropriate.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage of the Turf.js geospatial operations domain. It includes aggregation, boolean operations, measurements, transformations, interpolation, joins, and utilities, with no obvious gaps. The surface supports a wide range of geospatial workflows from basic geometry creation to advanced spatial analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues