Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
opendrs

opendrs

by error-path
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to opendrs

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gitlumen-mcp

      gitlumen-mcpofficial

      gitlumen-team
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to screen GitHub repositories and pull requests for risk analysis, generating risk scores, findings, and merge-readiness signals.
      5
      MIT
    • Koalr

      Koalrofficial

      koalr
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connect engineering metrics, DORA performance, deploy risk scoring, and PR health to any AI assistant. Score PRs for deployment risk using a 36-signal model, query team health, incidents, coverage, and more.
      MIT

    • gitworthy

      trippyogi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to scout, rank, and preflight software work before implementation, returning evidence-backed ACT, VERIFY, or SKIP decisions for issues and pull requests.
      74 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    While most tools target distinct functions (e.g., scoring a diff vs listing hotspots), there is significant conceptual overlap between `list_hotspots` and `explain_file_risk`. A user might find these boundary definitions slightly confusing when deciding which tool to use for a specific task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a highly predictable and consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout. The names are descriptive and adhere strictly to the chosen convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    The server is highly specialized in code risk assessment and review workflows. With 6 tools, the set is perfectly scoped, providing comprehensive coverage without unnecessary bloat or excessive complexity.

    Completeness5/5

    For its stated purpose—risk-aware development and automated review—the tools cover discovery (hotspots), quantitative assessment (score_diff), qualitative assessment (review_brief), and proactive workflow aid (self_check_items). No major gap in the risk-review lifecycle is apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources