Skip to main content
Glama
erpipe-org

Odoo MCP Server

by erpipe-org

health_check

Read-onlyIdempotent

Reports the server's runtime safety posture, indicating whether the Odoo MCP integration is operating securely. Use this status to confirm safe operation.

Instructions

Report this MCP server's non-secret runtime safety posture

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toolNoReporting tool name.
errorNoSanitized error message when success is false.
serverNoServer name, instructions, surface counts.
pluginsNoOpt-in plugin load state and tool filtering.
runtimeNoNon-secret runtime security posture.
successYesFalse when the call failed; see error.
rate_limitsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed11 schema fields changedv1.1.0
    • addedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Sanitized error message when success is false.",
      +  "title": "Error"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plugins
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Opt-in plugin load state and tool filtering.",
      +  "title": "Plugins"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / rate_limits
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Rate Limits"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": true,
      -  "title": "Result",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / runtime
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Non-secret runtime security posture.",
      +  "title": "Runtime"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / server
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Server name, instructions, surface counts.",
      +  "title": "Server"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / success
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "False when the call failed; see error.",
      +  "title": "Success",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / tool
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Reporting tool name.",
      +  "title": "Tool"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "result"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "success"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / title
      Previous value: -"health_checkOutput"New value: +"HealthCheckResponse"
  2. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive. The description adds 'non-secret runtime safety posture', clarifying scope but not revealing additional behavioral traits beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, concise, no redundant words. Every part contributes to clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, rich annotations, and an output schema, the description is sufficient. It omits output details but output schema compensates. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter meaning. Baseline 4 is appropriate for zero-param tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reports the server's non-secret runtime safety posture, a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from health-related siblings like accounting_health_across_instances which focus on different domains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The purpose is implied but no when-not or sibling differentiation is provided, leaving the agent to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/erpipe-org/mcp-odoo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server