Skip to main content
Glama
ericmaddox

Calyx MCP

by ericmaddox
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Calyx MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Senior Code MCP

      Tamaz-sujashvili
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives coding agents a memory of codebases by searching repositories using semantic similarity and structural call/import graphs, enabling reuse of proven patterns and reducing token usage.
      6
      1
      -

    • KOPENG

      djy89
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistent, self-curating memory for coding agents. It enables local, zero-cost context recall through MCP tools with hybrid retrieval and autonomous consolidation.
      -

    • memory-engine

      top777
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables programming agents to capture errors and conversation signals, reflect on root causes, consolidate reusable skills, and retrieve relevant context for future tasks, providing a self-learning memory loop.
      15
      MIT

    • cogmem

      dcondrey
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Self-improving, verifiable memory for AI coding agents. Learns how you work, stops repeating mistakes, models each project, recalls the right lesson at the right moment. Every memory is signed and tamper-evident. Local-first.
      8
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • Engram Alpha

      lalithbuilds
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local AI coding agents and web agents to store, retrieve, and search memories using hybrid semantic, lexical, and knowledge-graph ranking with cognitive decay modeling in a local on-device database.
      15
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct action: check_code_reflex evaluates proposed code, query_associative_memory performs raw similarity search, remember_code_outcome writes, inspect_memory_state reports stats, and reset_memory clears. The only mild overlap is between check_code_reflex and query_associative_memory, both of which read the associative store, but their input/output contracts differ enough to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All five names are snake_case verb_noun constructions (check_code_reflex, remember_code_outcome, query_associative_memory, inspect_memory_state, reset_memory), giving a predictable pattern. Minor deviation: reset_memory and inspect_memory_state drop the '_code_' qualifier used by the others, but readability remains high.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a lightweight associative memory service, with each tool mapping to a clear lifecycle operation (write, read, evaluate, inspect, reset). No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full memory lifecycle: write (remember_code_outcome), read/search (query_associative_memory, check_code_reflex), introspection (inspect_memory_state), and deletion (reset_memory). Minor gaps like bulk import/export or targeted single-memory deletion exist but are not blocking for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources