Skip to main content
Glama
equinoxaifinance-rgb

Living Stack MCP — Retired Beta Listing

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
LIVING_STACK_STATE_DIRNoDirectory for state storage. Defaults to ~/.living-stack-mcp/state.~/.living-stack-mcp/state
LIVING_STACK_ALLOWED_ROOTSNoExplicit roots allowed for release-manifest verification.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}
resources
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
livingstack.statusA

Describe this standalone Living Stack MCP server, its enforced boundaries, configured risk policy, and available capability classes. This does not inspect a customer session.

livingstack.session_startA

Create an isolated capability session with an immutable scope, goal, retention period, and hard between-action budget ceiling.

livingstack.session_statusA

Read the current scope hash, lifecycle status, budget, pending authorization count, and ledger integrity for one session.

livingstack.context_putA

Add redacted, provenance-labeled context to the current session. Stored context remains historical until independently reverified.

livingstack.retrieve_contextA

Search only the current session context using deterministic lexical retrieval and return provenance plus receipt hashes.

livingstack.authorize_actionA

Evaluate an intended action against server-owned risk policy and the session budget. The default policy denies external and destructive risks, and this server never executes the action itself.

livingstack.record_outcomeA

Consume one prior authorization, reconcile reserved cost, and append a tamper-evident outcome with typed evidence references.

livingstack.check_claimC

Determine whether a completion, working, integrity, or deployment claim has fresh successful typed evidence in the verified session ledger.

livingstack.checkpoint_saveB

Redact and persist a bounded state object bound to the session scope and current ledger lineage.

livingstack.checkpoint_loadB

Load a checkpoint only after session, scope, state hash, expiry, ledger integrity, and lineage checks pass.

livingstack.trace_reportA

Verify the event chain and return aggregate event, outcome, budget, and lifecycle data without raw private payloads.

livingstack.trace_exportA

Convert the verified lifecycle ledger into metadata-only OTLP/JSON trace data and sign the exact export with the local workspace Ed25519 identity. Raw context, goals, targets, summaries, and checkpoint state are excluded.

livingstack.verify_releaseA

Freshly hash each declared file from a JSON manifest under a host-configured allowed root. Paths outside configured roots remain unresolved.

livingstack.session_closeA

Mark a session closed while preserving its tamper-evident evidence history.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
Living Stack MCP capabilitiesProduct capabilities, boundaries, and integration contract.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 14 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or lifecycle step: session status vs server status, context retrieval vs checkpoint loading, and trace report vs trace export are all clearly separated by their descriptions. No two tools appear to perform the same operation.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools share the livingstack prefix and snake_case, but the object/verb order is inconsistent: session_start, context_put, and checkpoint_save are noun-verb while retrieve_context, authorize_action, and check_claim are verb-noun. Status, session_status, trace_report, and trace_export are noun-like, so no single naming pattern dominates.

Tool Count5/5

Fourteen tools is within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool maps to a distinct capability class such as session lifecycle, context management, authorization, checkpointing, tracing, and release verification. The count feels deliberately scoped rather than padded.

Completeness4/5

The core session, context, authorization, outcome, checkpoint, trace, and release verification lifecycle is well covered. Minor gaps exist: context_put mentions independent reverification but no explicit tool exposes that operation, and there is no session-listing or session-deletion tool beyond close.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues