Skip to main content
Glama
epolat

io.github.epolat/rankjot-mcp

by epolat

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
RANKJOT_API_KEYYesAPI key for RankJot. Generate at rankjot.com under Account → API access.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
check_rankA

Check where a domain ranks on Google for a keyword.

Args: domain: the site to look up, e.g. "example.com" (scheme/www/path ignored). keyword: the search query to rank for. country: ISO country code for the Google market (default "us"), e.g. "gb", "de". Rankings differ by country, so pass the market the user cares about.

Returns a dict with the 1-based position (null if the domain isn't in the results checked), the ranking url, the top-10 organic results, and the remaining quota. Failures come back as a dict with an error field.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only a single tool, there is no possibility of overlap or confusion about which tool to invoke. The tool's purpose is well-defined and unambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

The tool name 'check_rank' uses a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. Although there is no comparison set, the naming is internally consistent and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

The server is narrowly scoped to a single rank-checking operation, so one tool is serviceable. However, related features like batch ranking checks or quota status would strengthen the server, making the count slightly thin.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the core 'check rank' operation completely and returns relevant data. The lack of batch operations, historical tracking, or multi-keyword support leaves a notable gap for a rank-checking service.