Skip to main content
Glama
epicweb-dev

EpicMe MCP

by epicweb-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to EpicMe MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Basic MCP Application

      priteshshah96
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple application demonstrating Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration with FastAPI and Streamlit, allowing users to interact with LLMs through a clean interface.
      3
      -

    • Todo MCP Server

      shubhamc1947
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server with a built-in OAuth 2.1 authorization server and a Next.js todo app, enabling authenticated task management (create, read, update, delete tasks) via natural language through an MCP client.
      9 npm
      ISC

    • FlowStepMCP

      rodrigoramosrs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Complete Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to facilitate seamless interaction between Large Language Models (LLMs) and end-users. It provides a robust set of tools for notifications, confirmations, selections, and text inputs, supporting multiple rendering modes including Console, GUI, and Telegram Bot.
      2
      MIT

    • Data Analysis MCP Server

      sankalp51
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows LLMs to create and manage user entries in a JSON file system database.
      1,632 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping or unclear purposes. For example, 'annotatedMessage', 'structuredContent', and 'getResourceLinks' all seem to demonstrate metadata or structured data features, making it difficult for an agent to choose between them. Similarly, 'echo' and 'printEnv' both serve debugging purposes, while 'add' and 'zip' are isolated utilities with no clear connection to the others.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming conventions are inconsistent and chaotic. There is a mix of styles: some tools use camelCase (e.g., 'annotatedMessage', 'getResourceLinks'), others use snake_case (e.g., 'longRunningOperation', 'printEnv'), and some are single words (e.g., 'add', 'echo', 'zip'). There is no discernible pattern, which makes the set harder to navigate and predict.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 11 tools, the count is reasonable for a server, but it feels borderline due to the lack of a clear domain. The tools appear to be a miscellaneous collection of demonstrations and utilities rather than a cohesive set for a specific purpose, making the number seem slightly high for the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks a clear domain, making it difficult to assess completeness. However, based on the tool descriptions, it seems to be a demonstration server for MCP features. There are significant gaps: for example, if it's meant to showcase MCP capabilities, it might miss tools for other core features like streaming or error handling. The tools are fragmented and don't form a complete workflow or coverage of a specific area.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources