Get Cloud Resources

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. 'Get' implies a read operation, but the description does not confirm read-only behavior, nor does it disclose pagination (though paging param exists), required filters, or any side effects. The behavioral traits are under-communicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise, but it sacrifices informativeness. It does not convey essential details about the tool's behavior. It is minimal but not efficiently helpful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (3 parameters, many filter subfields, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely inadequate. It fails to explain the resource type, filtering logic, ordering, pagination, or return format. The agent would struggle to use this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% – the description does not mention any parameters or their roles. The input schema has complex nested objects (filters, paging) but the description adds zero value beyond the schema. For a tool with 3 parameters and low schema documentation in description, this is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get cloud resources from env0' specifies the verb and resource, but is vague. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like get-cloud-configurations, which also retrieves cloud-related data. The purpose is somewhat clear but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. The description does not mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or comparative context with sibling tools like get-cloud-configurations. The agent must infer usage from the schema alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.