Skip to main content
Glama
UniFi MCP Server

UniFi MCP Server

list_innerspace_access_points

Lists access points known to InnerSpace for a specified console, enabling you to inspect available APs before configuration or troubleshooting.

Instructions

List access points known to InnerSpace on a console.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "console_id": "<console_id>"
    },
    "name": "list_innerspace_access_points"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
console_idYesCloud Connector console UUID (from ``list_hosts``)
controllerNoController to run against (see list_controllers). Defaults to the controller chosen with select_controller, then the server default.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.6.4
    • addedInput schema / properties / console_id / description
      Added value: +"Cloud Connector console UUID (from ``list_hosts``)"
  2. Addedv0.6.1

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies a read-only list operation but does not mention permissions, pagination, caching, or other behavioral traits beyond the scope phrase "known to InnerSpace on a console."

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with zero waste, front-loaded with the core action and resource. Nothing is bloated or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is low-complexity (two parameters, one required) and has an output schema, so return values need not be explained. However, the description lacks sibling differentiation and usage guidance, leaving meaningful gaps for an agent selecting among many list tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters thoroughly. The description adds no parameter-specific detail beyond what the schema provides, making baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ("List") and resource ("access points") scoped to InnerSpace on a console. It does not differentiate from sibling list tools such as list_innerspace_switches or list_innerspace_inventory, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternatives. An agent must infer from the name that this is the tool for listing InnerSpace access points on a specific console.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools