create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a non-read-only, non-destructive, non-idempotent mutation. The description adds a duplicate-check workflow and the status_slug default, but it does not cover return format, permissions, or other side effects beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short sentences, front-loaded with the core action followed by the duplicate-check guidance and one key default. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich 100% schema coverage and existing safety annotations, the description is complete enough to invoke the tool correctly. It could better distinguish subtask creation via create_subtask, but that gap is minor against the structured data available.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 14 parameters. The description adds only slight extra nuance for status_slug by calling it the 'initial status' and clarifying the default comes from the project's first status.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Create a new task.' It is immediately clear what the tool does, but it does not distinguish itself from sibling creation tools such as create_subtask or create_recurring_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear prerequisite: check get_my_tasks and list_tasks first to avoid duplicates. However, it does not explicitly say when to use this tool instead of create_subtask or create_recurring_task.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.