Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to constellation-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to query security checklists, protocols, and framework mappings to safely build and operate AI agents, with tools for checklist runs, protocol lookup, mapping lookup, and threat search.
      9
      CC BY-4.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM-driven security assessments by exposing Kali tools like nmap, httpx, sqlmap, and ffuf as MCP tools, with explicit planning, parallel tool calls, tiered memory, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and human approval gates for intrusive operations.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes the Maester security test framework for Microsoft 365/Entra/Defender as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to run tests, audit AI agents and MCP servers, and investigate security posture.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates 7 security tools (nmap, nuclei, dirsearch, sqlmap, hydra, Acunetix, Metasploit) via MCP protocol for AI-assisted penetration testing with enterprise-grade safety features.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All tools are cleanly separated by domain prefixes (mhangani_, gavaza_, nyarhi_) and each tool has a distinct purpose. Even similar operations like find vs search or report vs report are clearly differentiated by prefix and detailed descriptions, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool name follows a consistent lowercase snake_case pattern with a domain prefix and a verb or verb+noun structure (e.g., mhangani_audit, gavaza_breach_add, nyarhi_add_node). No mixed conventions or inconsistent verb styles are present.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the server is far beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the tools are organized into three distinct domains, combining them makes the surface overly heavy and likely to overwhelm agents. Each domain would be better served as a separate server.

    Completeness3/5

    The audit and compliance domains have strong lifecycle coverage (authorize, audit, report, baseline, breach, requests, evidence). However, the knowledge graph domain lacks direct update and delete operations, relying only on undo, which is a notable gap for full graph management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues