get_latest_documents

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'paginated list' and 'recently updated' implying an ordering by update time, but fails to specify the sorting direction (descending?), pagination mechanism (e.g., cursor or offset), or whether it is a read-only operation. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, these behavioral gaps are significant.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short sentences. The first delivers the primary purpose immediately, and the second adds a usage hint. There is no redundant information or unnecessary detail. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 optional params, no output schema, no nested objects), the description covers the basic purpose and a typical use case. However, it omits essential details for a paginated tool: how to navigate pages (only a limit parameter, no page/offset/cursor), and what constitutes 'recently updated' (time window? last 24h?). This incomplete guidance hinders an agent's ability to use the tool effectively for pagination.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds some context by framing the parameters within 'most recently updated documents' but does not provide additional meaning beyond what the schema already states for 'limit' and 'status.' No extra enrichment is offered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets 'a paginated list of the most recently updated documents,' specifying verb (Get), resource (list of documents), and a distinct qualifier (most recently updated). This distinguishes it from siblings like list_all_docs (which likely lists all without recency filter) and find_document (which is search-based).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly notes the tool is 'useful for monitoring ingestion progress,' providing a clear context of use. However, it does not mention when not to use it or any specific alternatives, which would strengthen the guidance. Still, the context is helpful and non-misleading.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.