echo
Returns the input message unchanged for testing or validation purposes.
Instructions
Echoes a message
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | Yes |
Returns the input message unchanged for testing or validation purposes.
Echoes a message
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only says 'echoes' without disclosing side effects, permissions, or return value details. For a simple tool, minimal disclosure is still a gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One short sentence with no fluff. Appropriately concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple echo with one parameter, the description is minimal but acceptable. However, it doesn't specify that it returns the same message, which would be helpful. Lacks guidance on usage vs sibling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has one parameter with no description; description does not add any meaning beyond the schema. With 0% schema description coverage, this is insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it echoes a message, but does not differentiate from sibling tool 'ping' which likely serves a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling 'ping' or any other tool. The agent must infer usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/enmanuelmag/heimdall-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server