Skip to main content
Glama

wait_a_moment

Introduce controlled delays in cryptocurrency operations to manage timing requirements, handle rate limits, or coordinate sequential actions within automated trading workflows.

Instructions

Wait for some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
secondsYes

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for the 'wait_a_moment' tool. It takes a 'seconds' parameter (float), sleeps for that duration using asyncio.sleep, and returns a dict confirming the wait time. Registered as an MCP tool via the @mcp.tool() decorator.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def wait_a_moment(seconds:float):
        """Wait for some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds"""
        await asyncio.sleep(seconds)
        return {"waited": seconds}
  • The @mcp.tool() decorator registers the wait_a_moment function as an MCP tool.
    @mcp.tool()
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the wait is 'short' and limited to 'no more than 10 seconds,' which adds context about duration constraints. However, it does not cover other behavioral traits such as whether the wait is blocking, if it respects system interrupts, error handling, or performance implications. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence: 'Wait for some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds.' It is front-loaded with the core action and includes a key constraint without unnecessary details. Every word earns its place, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is somewhat complete but has gaps. It covers the basic purpose and a constraint, but lacks details on parameter usage, behavioral aspects, and output expectations. For a simple tool, it's adequate but could be more informative to fully guide an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter ('seconds') with 0% description coverage in the schema. The description does not explicitly mention or explain this parameter, but it implies it by stating 'some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds,' which indirectly relates to the 'seconds' parameter. However, it does not add detailed meaning beyond what the schema's title ('Seconds') and type ('number') provide, such as valid ranges or units. With low schema coverage, the description compensates only partially.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Wait for some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds.' It specifies the verb ('wait') and the resource ('time'), and distinguishes itself from all sibling tools, which are related to crypto wallet management, trading, and data queries. However, it could be slightly more specific about the exact nature of the waiting (e.g., blocking vs. non-blocking).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by mentioning 'some short amount of time, no more than 10 seconds,' which suggests it's for brief delays. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., for timing operations, rate limiting, or testing), nor does it provide exclusions or prerequisites. The context is clear but lacks detailed guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/emmaThompson07/armor-crypto-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server