Skip to main content
Glama
emile-fortier

paper-trader-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to paper-trader-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local paper-trading and market simulation MCP server for multi-account portfolios, advanced orders, options/futures, backtesting, alerts, and automation.
      60
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing a registry of paper-backed quantitative trading methods plus a deterministic, no-LLM decision helper for reproducible trading research.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for natural-language daily stock/ETF strategy backtesting. It provides constrained tools for strategy specification, data validation, queue-based backtests, and verifiable result artifacts.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for A-share stock trading via Tonghuashun, offering account/position queries, buy/sell/cancel orders with risk controls and forced user confirmation; currently simulated with a reserved interface for real broker channels.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Test/Sandbox MCP server that integrates with the SnapTrade API Sandbox environment to provide portfolio oversight, market data, and trading capabilities.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Review-only MCP server for stock, options, and crypto screening, trade planning, risk checks, backtesting, and journaling, designed to work alongside Robinhood's Trading MCP without placing orders.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action: recording entry, recording exit, evaluating, reading one, and listing. The purposes are clearly separated by the verb (record, close, evaluate, get, list) and by the descriptive text, so an agent should not confuse them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same pattern: the resource prefix 'paper_trade' followed by a clear verb (_record, _get, _list, _evaluate, _close). This is a perfectly consistent verb_noun (or resource_verb) convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a paper trading simulator. It covers the core operations without redundancy or bloat, fitting comfortably in the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers a complete lifecycle: record entry intent, evaluate fills/marks, close exits, and query individual or all trades. No obvious gaps exist for simulation-only day trading; even potential missing operations like cancel are handled by day-order expiration.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues