paper-trader-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to paper-trader-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal paper-trading and market simulation MCP server for multi-account portfolios, advanced orders, options/futures, backtesting, alerts, and automation.60MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing a registry of paper-backed quantitative trading methods plus a deterministic, no-LLM decision helper for reproducible trading research.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for natural-language daily stock/ETF strategy backtesting. It provides constrained tools for strategy specification, data validation, queue-based backtests, and verifiable result artifacts.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server for A-share stock trading via Tonghuashun, offering account/position queries, buy/sell/cancel orders with risk controls and forced user confirmation; currently simulated with a reserved interface for real broker channels.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Test/Sandbox MCP server that integrates with the SnapTrade API Sandbox environment to provide portfolio oversight, market data, and trading capabilities.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceReview-only MCP server for stock, options, and crypto screening, trade planning, risk checks, backtesting, and journaling, designed to work alongside Robinhood's Trading MCP without placing orders.1-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action: recording entry, recording exit, evaluating, reading one, and listing. The purposes are clearly separated by the verb (record, close, evaluate, get, list) and by the descriptive text, so an agent should not confuse them.
All tool names follow the same pattern: the resource prefix 'paper_trade' followed by a clear verb (_record, _get, _list, _evaluate, _close). This is a perfectly consistent verb_noun (or resource_verb) convention.
Five tools is well-scoped for a paper trading simulator. It covers the core operations without redundancy or bloat, fitting comfortably in the ideal 3-15 range.
The tool set covers a complete lifecycle: record entry intent, evaluate fills/marks, close exits, and query individual or all trades. No obvious gaps exist for simulation-only day trading; even potential missing operations like cancel are handled by day-order expiration.