Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to toolwrit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic security policies as an inline firewall for MCP server tool calls, with AST-based validation, cryptographic audit logging, and CLI-based evaluation and verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces allow/deny/ask policies on MCP tool calls before they reach downstream servers, with tamper-evident audit logging.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces default-deny policies, budgets, and tamper-evident audit logging for MCP tool calls before they reach upstream servers.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An authorizing reverse proxy for MCP servers that enforces per-call policy rules on tool arguments with audit logging, dry-run, and rate limiting.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Security gateway that wraps any MCP server with per-tool policies, approval gates, and optional Ed25519-signed decision receipts. Shadow mode logs every tool call without blocking; enforce mode applies block, rate-limit, and minimum-tier rules. Receipts are independently verifiable offline with no accounts needed.
      5
      926 npm
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a governance proxy layer for MCP servers, enforcing per-tool allowlists, human approval for write operations, quotas, secret redaction, and a hash-chained audit log of all calls.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (read, list, search, metadata). However, read_file is a deprecated alias for read_text_file, creating a genuine overlap, and list_directory vs list_directory_with_sizes differ only by the sizes column. The descriptions do enough to steer selection, but these pairs are confusable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names mostly follow a verb_noun convention (read_file, read_text_file, list_directory, search_files, get_file_info, list_allowed_directories). The lone deviation is directory_tree, which is a noun phrase rather than verb_noun. Overall predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a filesystem server, covering read, list, search, and metadata operations without bloat. Every tool except the deprecated read_file earns its place.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is purely read-oriented: there is no write_file, create_directory, move_file, or edit operation despite the server name suggesting writing. For a general filesystem domain this is a notable gap, though for a read-only browsing use case it would be near-complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues