get_ember_version_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosure. It states the tool returns version information but does not specify output format, potential side effects, or limitations. The description is adequate but lacks detail beyond listing the types of information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the action and key details. No extraneous text; every sentence adds value. Efficient for an AI agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers core functionality. It mentions specific return items (current stable, what's new, migration guides). However, it omits details like error handling or format expectations, leaving minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single optional parameter. The description essentially repeats the schema info ('specific version, optional, returns latest if not specified'), adding no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves Ember version info including stable version, what's new, and migration guides. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_npm_package_info by focusing specifically on Ember version details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions it is 'useful for understanding version-specific features and deprecations,' providing context for when to use it. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like search_ember_docs or get_api_reference, which could also provide version-related info.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.