MCP Parse Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Parse Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Parse Platform databases, users, files, and more through the Model Context Protocol.393 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Xano API through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface, providing secure and type-safe management of Xano database operations.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Linear's API for managing issues, teams, and projects programmatically through the Model Context Protocol.783 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with MongoDB databases and MongoDB Atlas through the Model Context Protocol, providing tools for database operations and Atlas management.82,973 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Grist documents, workspaces, and records via the Model Context Protocol. It supports comprehensive operations including SQL querying, schema management, and record CRUD functionality.1162 npm3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Edgee API for managing organizations, projects, domains, components, users, invitations, and API tokens through the Model Context Protocol.8 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear separation between object, schema, role, user, and relation operations. Even similar deletes (field, class, object) are unambiguous due to explicit resource naming.
All tools follow a consistent parse_<verb>_<resource> pattern, using clear verbs like create, get, update, delete, list, add, remove, and query. Minor variations like get vs list are contextually appropriate (singular vs plural).
35 tools is above typical ranges, but the server covers the broad domain of Parse Server management including objects, schemas, roles, users, relations, and cloud code. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, making the large count justified for the scope.
Object, schema, role, and relation operations have comprehensive CRUD coverage, but user management is incomplete: users can be created, fetched, and listed, yet there are no update_user or delete_user tools. This leaves a notable lifecycle gap.