Skip to main content
Glama
elvirus839

EvidentTrail MCP

by elvirus839
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to EvidentTrail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Dvarapala

      demolished-lab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.
      MIT

    • mcp-audit-gateway

      elang2
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit trail for AI agent tool calls. Cryptographically signed, hash-chained records that prove what your agents did.
      3
      48 npm
      MIT

    • AgentAudit MCP

      Rumblingb
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an immutable, tamper-evident audit trail for AI agents, enabling event logging with cryptographic chaining, search, verification, and statistics.
      3
      MIT

    • Selvedge

      masondelan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Change tracking for AI-era codebases. AI agents call it to log structured change events (entity + diff + reasoning) before the session ends, then query history with diff, blame, history, changeset, and search. Captures the intent that would otherwise evaporate.
      8
      205 PyPI
      24
      MIT

    • Inficy

      artnames
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Captures AI agent runs and turns them into tamper-evident execution records showing tool use, timing, failures, recoveries, and human interventions. Records can be inspected, exported, and verified offline.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With a single tool there is no possibility of misselection; the tool's purpose (logging an agent action as compliance evidence) is unambiguous and clearly stated. No overlap risk exists in the current surface.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The name et_log_action follows a clear, predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern with a consistent server prefix. Though there is only one tool, the convention is well-defined and would scale cleanly.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is extremely thin for a compliance-evidence server, which typically implies writing, querying, and verifying records. One write-only operation cannot cover the apparent scope of the domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface only supports appending evidence; there is no way to retrieve, search, list, verify, or export logged actions. These gaps would leave an agent unable to confirm or audit what was recorded, a dead end for a compliance workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources