generate_wireframe

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fully bears responsibility for behavioral disclosure, but it only mentions the output is 'low-fidelity layout sketch using text characters'. It does not describe limitations, performance characteristics, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is two sentences long, front-loading purpose. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, earning high conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, 1 required, and no output schema or annotations, the description covers the core function but omits usage scenarios, output format details, and behavioral nuances. It is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so schema provides adequate meaning. The description adds no additional semantic nuance beyond confirming the tool handles pages and components, hence achieving baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'generate', resource 'ASCII wireframe mockup', and defines it as 'low-fidelity layout sketch using text characters'. It uniquely identifies the tool among siblings, none of which generate wireframes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as generate_component_example or other layout tools. The description implies use for early-stage sketching but lacks when-not-to-use or alternative suggestions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.