NomaCMS MCP Serverofficial
A
licenseB
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server for NomaCMS. Manage collections, fields, content, and assets via AI agents.
39
25 npm
1
MIT
elmapicms-mcp-server
Officialby elmapicms
Related Servers
Alternatives to elmapicms-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants like Cursor and Claude to interact with the Storyblok Management API. It allows users to manage stories, tags, components, assets, and workflows through natural language commands.7422 npm-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA SitecoreMCP version that can be used in enterprises100484 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for WordPress content management via REST API, supporting posts, pages, media, comments, and terms through natural language interfaces like Cursor, ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.11 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server wrapping the Cursor CLI agent, enabling Claude Code and other MCP clients to delegate tasks to Cursor's AI agent for file writing, bash commands, and codebase queries.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server that turns any CMS backend into an AI-agent-ready content management system. It provides tools for content CRUD, idea management, and publication tracking, with safety features requiring human approval for publishing.52MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation5/5
All 18 tools target distinct resources and actions (e.g., create_collection vs create_entry vs create_field), with no overlapping purposes. Each tool has a clear and separate role.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case (e.g., create_collection, list_entries, upload_asset), with no deviations or style mixing.
Tool Count4/5
With 18 tools, the count is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but still reasonable for a full-featured CMS server. Each tool serves a specific function without bloat.
Completeness3/5
CRUD coverage is strong for entries and assets, but notable gaps exist: no delete_collection or delete_field tools, and no update_asset. Reorder operations are included but are less critical.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues