Check Cloud Lock

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the tool is a safe, read-only operation. The description adds valuable context about the cloud sync filter domain, complementing the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences with no unnecessary words, front-loading the core purpose. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose, relevant OS, and the type of blocking. However, it omits expected return values or behavior (e.g., boolean or error), which would be helpful given no output schema. Still, for a one-parameter check, it is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with one parameter described as 'Path to check.' The description does not add further details about the parameter beyond what the schema already provides, so it meets the baseline without enhancement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks if a path might be blocked by a cloud sync filter (cldflt.sys). The verb 'prüft ob' and specific resource ('Pfad') uniquely identify its purpose, and it is distinct from siblings as no other tool mentions cloud lock.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly notes 'Nur auf Windows relevant,' providing clear context for when to use the tool. However, it does not mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives, though no direct sibling alternative exists for this specific check.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.