Skip to main content
Glama
elliotttate

Final Cut Pro MCP Server

by elliotttate
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Final Cut Pro MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • fcp-mcp

      kks0488
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to analyze, edit, quality-check, and generate Final Cut Pro FCPXML timelines through 30 tools, including marker management, editing, QC grading, and EDL/CSV export. Also provides AppleScript and GUI automation to move timelines in and out of Final Cut Pro without manual menu clicks.
      MIT

    • fcp-mcp-server

      meilawson
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to read, analyze, edit, and generate real Final Cut Pro timelines from exported FCPXML, covering cut and flash-frame detection, silence removal, markers, roles, keyframes, speed ramps, transcript-based editing, health checks, and cross-NLE export through 102 operations across 15 grouped tools. Every write is journaled, sha256-verified and undoable, and timelines can be pushed straight into a running Final Cut Pro.
      -

    • resolve-mcp

      irstone-source
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides an AI assistant with 132 tools to control DaVinci Resolve Studio on macOS, enabling project management, media handling, timeline editing, color grading, rendering, and Fusion compositing through natural language commands.
      100
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 100 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping or ambiguous purposes, such as 'audio_operations' being vague while 'adjust_volume' and 'audio_fade_management' exist, or 'selection' and 'select_tool' being unclear in distinction. The high tool count exacerbates confusion, with multiple tools like 'add_effect' and 'add_color_correction' potentially overlapping in function, making it difficult for an agent to reliably choose the correct tool without trial and error.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed with some consistency in verb_noun patterns like 'add_color_correction' and 'create_compound_clip', but there are deviations such as 'blade' (noun-only), 'navigate' (verb-only), and inconsistent styles like 'audio_fade_management' (noun-heavy) versus 'adjust_volume' (verb_noun). While readable, the lack of a uniform convention across all tools reduces predictability and coherence in the tool set.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 100 tools, this server is extremely overloaded for a video editing domain, far exceeding the typical well-scoped range of 3-15 tools. Such a high count suggests poor scoping, likely including many redundant or overly granular tools that could overwhelm agents and lead to inefficiency in tool selection and usage, indicating a severe mismatch between scope and implementation.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for Final Cut Pro editing, including core operations like adding effects, color correction, timeline management, audio controls, and advanced features like AI tools and XML handling. There are no obvious gaps; it supports full CRUD/lifecycle workflows from import to export, with tools for media management, editing, and sharing, ensuring agents can handle most tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources