legalize-mx-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to legalize-mx-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search Mexican federal and state statutes, Supreme Court theses, and precedents, returning verifiable citations with dated validity, public URLs, and explicit indication of whether case law is binding jurisprudence or merely persuasive.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Mexican federal legislation (316 laws indexed) through natural language, with tools for legal consultation, pricing, and law catalog browsing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and agents to search a legal document collection via hybrid BM25+dense retrieval, read articles with context, and generate full or short citations. It also exposes whole acts as Markdown resources, provides a citation-answering prompt, and supports stdio and streamable HTTP transports.MIT

Legalizeofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and read consolidated legislation from multiple countries, retrieve exact law texts as of any historical date with citations and git commit SHAs, and create webhook or email subscriptions to track legal changes.2MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to search and retrieve legal sources from Mexican and inter-American courts (SCJN, TFJA, DOF, Corte IDH) with complete citations and official links.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to look up Chinese laws and statutory articles fully offline from a local SQLite database, resolving a law name plus article number to verbatim text, searching articles by keyword, and retrieving a law's chapter structure and version history. It also verifies citations in bulk, checking whether each quoted provision exists word-for-word and is currently in force.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a fairly distinct operation: search (buscar_norma), full read (leer_norma), single article (articulo), reform history (historial), version comparison (diff), official sources (fuentes), coverage metadata (cobertura), and DOF live tools. Minor overlap exists between leer_norma/articulo (both return text) and between fuentes and leer_norma's catalog fallback, but descriptions clarify the boundaries.
All names are snake_case and readable, but the convention is mixed: some use verb_noun (buscar_norma, leer_norma, leer_nota_dof, actualizar_indice) while others are bare nouns (articulo, historial, diff, fuentes, cobertura, dof_del_dia). Readable but not a predictable single pattern.
10 tools is well-scoped for a legal-norm research server, with each tool earning a distinct role across search, retrieval, provenance, and freshness workflows. No redundant or filler tools.
The surface covers the research lifecycle well: discovery, reading (full/partial/by article), historical versions, diffs, citation sources, coverage reporting, and live DOF retrieval plus index refresh. Minor gaps like a bulk/export or citation-formatting tool are absent but workable around.