session_profile_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a read but never states read-only semantics, error behavior for an unknown profile name, or any auth/permission requirements for a session-scoped lookup.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with the key information front-loaded and no filler. It is efficient, though arguably terse given the absence of annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and there is only one parameter. However, with zero annotations and no error or identity resolution guidance, the definition is only minimally complete for an agent to call it reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the schema only says 'Profile' is a string. The description adds genuine value by clarifying the accepted forms ('by name or account alias'), partially compensating for the coverage gap, but it gives no format or validation details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get) and resource (saved profile) with scope ('one'), which cleanly distinguishes it from the sibling session_profile_list. It does not explicitly name siblings, but the singular/plural split is self-evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'saved profile' but there is no explicit when-to-use, no note on what happens if the profile is missing, and no pointer to session_get or session_profile_list as alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.