Skip to main content
Glama
notification-mcp

notification-mcp

by elad12390

Related Servers

Alternatives to notification-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that rings a bell through your speakers to provide audible notifications when AI completes tasks or needs attention.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that plays notification sounds when AI coding assistants like Windsurf or Cursor require user attention, such as when coding is complete or when user approval is needed.
      7 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A streamlined MCP server that enables AI assistants to send real-time notifications to your devices through the ntfy service, allowing you to receive alerts when tasks complete or important events occur.
      2
      239 npm
      76
      GPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that sends webhook notifications to a configured URL, enabling AI assistants to notify users when long-running tasks complete.
      7 npm
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets AI agents send desktop notifications during tasks, ask for attention, and report completion. Supports macOS, Linux, and Windows, with optional webhook delivery.
      825
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    report_issue and notify serve clearly different purposes: one reports bugs/features about the MCP server, the other sends user-facing notifications. An agent can easily choose the correct tool based on task context.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use lowercase snake_case and start with a verb, but report_issue follows a verb_noun pattern while notify is a lone verb. This is a minor inconsistency, not confusing.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the set is thin for a dedicated server, though both tools are distinct and useful. It falls into the borderline 1-2 tool range noted in the rubric.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core notification action and provides a feedback path via report_issue. Minor gaps exist around notification management or delivery status, but these are not essential for basic use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues