Create Buildin page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It accurately states that the tool returns the created page object and mentions the parent types and property requirement for databases. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, error conditions, authentication needs, rate limits, or what happens if properties do not match the database schema (e.g., validation errors). This is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences, front-loading the primary purpose immediately ("Create a new page in Buildin.ai"). Every sentence adds value without redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (5 parameters, nested objects) and lack of annotations or output schema, the description covers the key aspects: purpose, parent types, database-specific requirement, and return object. It could mention potential error scenarios or prerequisites, but the schema fills in the details, making this reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, meaning the schema already provides descriptions for all parameters. The description adds a bit of context by enumerating parent types and restating the database property requirement, but it does not add significant new meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the verb 'create' and resource 'page in Buildin.ai', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'buildin_create_database' or 'buildin_append_block_children'. It also specifies the parent types (page_id, database_id, etc.), making the purpose clear and unique.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides context on when to use the tool, explaining the acceptable parent types and the special case for database parents requiring matching properties. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare with alternatives like 'buildin_update_page' or 'buildin_archive_page', but the provided context is sufficient for most scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.