AWS Customer Playbook Advisor MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_aws_playbookC | AWS公式プレイブックフレームワークから最新のセキュリティプレイブックを取得します |
| get_prevention_guidanceC | AWSサービスの予防的セキュリティガイダンスを公式プレイブックから取得します |
| list_available_playbooksB | 利用可能なAWSセキュリティプレイブックの一覧を取得します |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have some overlap in purpose, as all three retrieve AWS security playbooks or guidance, making them potentially confusing. However, descriptions help differentiate them: get_aws_playbook fetches a specific playbook, get_prevention_guidance focuses on preventive guidance, and list_available_playbooks lists available options. This reduces ambiguity but doesn't eliminate it entirely.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: get_aws_playbook, get_prevention_guidance, and list_available_playbooks. The verbs 'get' and 'list' are clear and predictable, with no deviations in style or convention across the set.
With only 3 tools, the count feels thin for a server focused on AWS security playbooks, as it may lack operations like creating, updating, or deleting playbooks. However, it's reasonable for a read-only advisory service, though it borders on being under-scoped for typical agent workflows.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for the domain of AWS security playbook management. It only supports retrieval and listing operations, with no tools for creating, updating, or applying playbooks. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform full lifecycle management, leaving obvious gaps in coverage.