segnals_get_account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It discloses the required scope ('read:account') and implies a read-only operation. However, it does not detail potential side effects, error handling, or rate limits. Given the simplicity of the tool, this is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise—two sentences and an example. It is front-loaded with the purpose, followed by usage guidance and requirements. Every sentence serves a purpose without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description provides a clear purpose, usage guidance, required scope, and an example. It is fairly complete for a simple read operation, though it could mention error cases. The combination of purpose, usage, and example adequately prepares an agent to select and invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by listing the returned fields (tier, subscription status, bot limits, usage), which goes beyond the schema's minimal information. The example also clarifies usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies that the tool retrieves account details (tier, subscription status, bot limits, usage). The verb 'Get' and resource 'account details' are specific, and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like segnals_get_subscription or segnals_get_bot by focusing on account-level information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit use cases: 'check account standing or before creating bots.' It does not mention when not to use it or alternatives, but the context is clear. Sibling tools have distinct purposes, so the usage advice is helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.