get_my_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the data fields but does not mention behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, potential errors, or data freshness. Since this is a read-only, parameterless getter, the lack of edge-case disclosure is a minor gap but not severe.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the main purpose and then lists fields in a clear, comma-separated format. Every element carries information, with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool (no params, no output schema, no annotations), the description does well to enumerate the exact fields returned. It could moderately improve by explicitly stating that the data belongs to the authenticated user, but 'current student' already implies this. Overall, it is adequately complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema is an empty object. The description does not need to explain parameters; instead, it lists the fields in the return value. Per guidelines, the baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description adds value by enumerating the profile contents.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Get' and the resource 'current student's profile', followed by a comprehensive list of returned fields (ФИО, group, student book number, etc.). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_teacher_info and get_subject_info, which target different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description establishes clear context: it is for retrieving the current student's profile. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or when-not-to-use, but the scope is self-evident and the sibling tools target different resources, so there is little ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.