Skip to main content
Glama
egoughnour

curate-ipsum

by egoughnour
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to curate-ipsum

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Chiasmus

      yogthos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives LLMs access to formal verification via Z3 and SWI-Prolog, plus tree-sitter-based source code analysis. Translates natural language problems into formal logic using a template-based pipeline, verifies results with mathematical certainty, and analyzes call graphs for reachability, dead code, and impact analysis.
      72 npm
      213
      Apache 2.0

    • NOESIS

      AndrewBalda01
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A cognitive optimization engine exposed as an MCP server that amplifies LLM reasoning through self-consistency sampling, MCTS, Dung argumentation, symbolic verification, and measured confidence.
      MIT

    • MCP Solver

      swesmith-repos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Large Language Models to interactively create, edit, and solve constraint models using backends like MiniZinc, Z3, PySAT, and Clingo. It bridges natural language with symbolic reasoning for solving complex logical, SAT, SMT, and optimization problems.
      MIT

    • Hegelion

      Hmbown
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that improves LLM reasoning through dialectical argumentation and generates verified code via a player-coach loop.
      4
      173
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, and the descriptions are detailed enough to differentiate them. However, a few pairs could cause confusion, such as query_reachability and graph_query_tool (which also supports reachability queries), and the various history-related tools (get_run_history_tool, list_synthesis_runs_tool, list_world_history_tool). Overall, an agent can usually tell them apart with careful reading.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a verb_noun pattern and many end with '_tool', but five tools (extract_call_graph, compute_partitioning, query_reachability, get_hierarchy, find_function_partition) break the pattern by omitting the '_tool' suffix. This inconsistency, while minor, makes the set feel less uniform and could lead to an agent treating those tools as a separate category.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 41 tools, this server is extremely comprehensive, spanning testing, theory revision, call graph analysis, synthesis, verification, and RAG. While each tool may have a purpose, the sheer number is overwhelming and likely exceeds what an agent can effectively manage in a single server. The scope is too broad for a coherent toolset; it feels like multiple servers merged into one.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is remarkably complete for the domains it covers: testing, mutation analysis, belief revision, call graph operations, CEGIS synthesis, formal verification, and RAG. There are some minor gaps, such as no explicit deletion of evidence or regions, but these are workable through other tools (e.g., contract_assertion_tool serves as deletion for assertions). Overall, no critical dead ends are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources