Skip to main content
Glama
egoughnour

Code Firewall MCP

by egoughnour
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Code Firewall MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • senior-sde-mcp-guard

      amirmadani
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces AST-based architectural guardrails on AI-generated code, blocking writes that violate maintainability, security, or complexity rules and prompting immediate refactoring.
      2
      MIT

    • Prompt Rejector MCP

      revsmoke
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Protects AI agents from prompt injection attacks, jailbreak attempts, and common web vulnerabilities by screening untrusted input through semantic LLM analysis and static pattern matching.
      218 npm
      2
      ISC

    • MCP-Sentinel

      RoshiniMlakshmana
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A safety guard for AI assistants that inspects actions (file reads, queries, etc.) and classifies them as SAFE, SUSPICIOUS, or BLOCK with explanations, using both known-attack patterns and behavior-based zero-day detection.
      MIT

    • ContextLock

      LutaElbert
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP safety layer that blocks dangerous files and redacts secrets before AI agents can access them, ensuring safe vibe coding.
      6 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • pharos-guardskill

      codebycinar
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Pre-transaction security gate for Pharos AI agents that analyzes contract bytecode and on-chain state to assess risks like upgradeability and honeypot controls.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but firewall_check and firewall_check_code are very similar—both check code safety, differing only in input method (file vs. string). This could cause confusion, though their descriptions clarify the distinction. Other tools like blacklist, remove_pattern, and status are clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'firewall_' prefix with descriptive suffixes in snake_case, such as firewall_blacklist, firewall_check, and firewall_status. This pattern is uniform across all 11 tools, making them predictable and easy to identify.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the count is well-suited for a code firewall server, covering core operations like blacklisting, checking, setup, and status. Each tool serves a specific role in the domain, avoiding redundancy while providing comprehensive functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers key aspects of a code firewall: blacklist management (add, list, remove), safety checks (file and code variants), setup (Ollama installation), and status monitoring. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to update existing patterns, but agents can work around this by removing and re-adding.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources