Skip to main content
Glama
efforthye
by efforthye

Related Servers

Alternatives to fast-filesystem-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A tuned filesystem MCP server for Codex-style development, offering fast file operations, bounded output, and safe edits.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables AI models to perform local file operations, command execution, and task management across multiple platforms. It features advanced capabilities like row-level file editing, directory searching, and system monitoring with built-in security filters.
      13
      21 npm
      Mulan Permissive Software , Version 2
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that implements Claude Code-like functionality, allowing the AI to analyze codebases, modify files, execute commands, and manage projects through direct file system interactions.
      15
      304
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A drop-in replacement for the blocked Filesystem MCP server that provides standard file operations with symlink hardening, enabling tools like read, write, and directory listing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server that allows Claude to read and write local files on your machine with explicit approval gating for each access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with tools for file system management, Git integration, and shell command execution. It features specialized code utilities for analysis, formatting, and linting to enhance development workflows within Claude Desktop.
      28
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct, but there is notable overlap between fast_edit_block, fast_safe_edit, fast_edit_multiple_blocks, and fast_edit_blocks—all handle editing and could confuse an agent. Similarly, fast_search_files and fast_search_code have overlapping purposes despite different descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The fast_ prefix is applied consistently and most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., fast_read_file, fast_create_directory). Minor deviations like fast_edit_blocks vs fast_edit_multiple_blocks and fast_batch_file_operations are slightly inconsistent but still readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    25 tools is at the upper boundary of what is reasonable for a filesystem server. The count feels heavy because several tools overlap (multiple edit variants, two search tools, multiple read/write variants), but each has a plausible use case.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full filesystem lifecycle: read, write, edit, list, search, create, copy, move, delete, batch operations, compression, sync, and disk usage. There are no obvious dead ends for common file operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive