Skip to main content
Glama
efficjump

Preference Memory MCP

by efficjump

Related Servers

Alternatives to Preference Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that stores user-approved corrections, preferences, and reusable criteria in plain Markdown files, with separate global and project memory. It provides tools to list, search, and retrieve relevant criteria to help agents avoid repeating mistakes.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first memory MCP server that enables storing, searching, and managing personal memories with hybrid keyword and semantic recall, all on-device.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that provides a shared, private memory for multiple AI tools, enabling cross-model recall and automatic session ingestion.
      22 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that provides a sovereign memory substrate for LLMs, enabling capture, recall, explanation, and anticipation of conversation turns with bi-temporal events and a strict read-only query surface.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: reading by ID, observing candidates, recalling active memories, creating pending proposals, resolving them, and listing reviewable ones. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the 'memory_<verb>' pattern with clear, descriptive verbs (get, observe, recall, remember, resolve, review), ensuring predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the surface is well-scoped for a memory management server, covering core operations without being overly large or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover create, read, list, and resolve workflows. However, there is no explicit delete tool; while resolve may handle disposal, this omission is a minor gap for full CRUD coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues