Skip to main content
Glama
eduardoddddddd

youtube-music-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to youtube-music-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for YouTube Music that enables searching songs and artists, managing playlists, and authenticating via Google OAuth, using STDIO transport.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language management of a YouTube Music account, including playlist creation and editing, song search, ratings, and library organization through a local MCP server.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local read-only MCP server for YouTube Data API v3 and YouTube Analytics API, enabling public video searches and OAuth-based private channel reads.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI applications to search YouTube music videos and manage playlists via the YouTube Data API v3, with OAuth support for playlist and subscription management.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Spotify that enables searching, reading playlists, saved tracks, artist info, and recommendations, plus creating playlists and adding tracks, with no playback control.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and read YouTube data and safely manage playlists, including creating private playlists from ranked song matches with preview-before-commit playlist mutations.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: authentication status, listing liked songs, listing playlists, fetching a specific playlist, searching, summarizing, and exporting. There is no meaningful overlap; even similar-sounding tools like list_liked_songs and summarize_liked_library serve different functions (enumeration vs. aggregation).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, search_, summarize_, export_). The exception is auth_status, which lacks a verb and disrupts the otherwise uniform style. This minor deviation prevents a perfect score but the pattern is still highly readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well within the ideal range for a library-oriented MCP server. Each tool addresses a core function (authentication, listing, searching, exporting, summarizing) without redundancy or bloat. The count feels appropriately scoped for the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full lifecycle of interacting with a user's YouTube Music library: authenticate, list liked songs, list playlists, fetch playlist contents, search, summarize, and export. There are no obvious dead ends for typical workflows like browsing, analyzing, or exporting favorites. Minor operations like adding/removing likes are outside the apparent scope, so no gaps are evident.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues