Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agenthold

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables multi-agent collaboration across different AI assistants and projects by providing a universal coordination layer for MCP-compatible agents to communicate, share context, and coordinate complex tasks seamlessly.
    12
    29 npm
    33
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that provides a live coordination layer for AI agents, including attributable handoffs, a shared event ledger, atomic work-claiming, and advisory file leases to prevent collisions.
    27
    9
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets multiple AI coding agents share state, preserve context across sessions, and coordinate via a knowledge graph, messaging, and branch-preserving checkpoint/resume with conflict handling.
    42 npm
    Apache 2.0
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI coding agents to coordinate by sharing environment snapshots and diffs, surfacing overlapping work, exchanging debug-session messages, handing off tasks, and enforcing policy preflight checks.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for Nyxdoc, a document system where humans and external agents collaborate on documents with version history, agent to-dos, and workspace permissions.
    MIT

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: register sets up identity, claim acquires exclusive access, release relinquishes it, status checks availability, and wait blocks for availability. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each step in the coordination workflow.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'agenthold_' prefix with descriptive action names (register, claim, release, status, wait) in snake_case. This pattern is uniform across all five tools, providing predictability and readability without any deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of agent coordination and resource locking. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations: setup (register), acquisition (claim), release (release), checking (status), and waiting (wait). This count is neither too sparse nor bloated, fitting the domain perfectly.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides complete coverage for the agent coordination domain, covering the full lifecycle from registration to resource management. There are no gaps: agents can register, claim, check status, wait, and release resources, enabling seamless workflow without dead ends or missing critical operations.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues