agenthold
Related Servers
Alternatives to agenthold
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables multi-agent collaboration across different AI assistants and projects by providing a universal coordination layer for MCP-compatible agents to communicate, share context, and coordinate complex tasks seamlessly.1229 npm33MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA multi-agent task management system for AI applications that enables users to create agents with roles and capabilities, delegate tasks with trust-based routing, coordinate file access to prevent conflicts, and monitor performance through a unified dashboard.7 npm58 PyPIMIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides a live coordination layer for AI agents, including attributable handoffs, a shared event ledger, atomic work-claiming, and advisory file leases to prevent collisions.279AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets multiple AI coding agents share state, preserve context across sessions, and coordinate via a knowledge graph, messaging, and branch-preserving checkpoint/resume with conflict handling.42 npmApache 2.0

STMAofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI coding agents to coordinate by sharing environment snapshots and diffs, surfacing overlapping work, exchanging debug-session messages, handing off tasks, and enforcing policy preflight checks.-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to collaborate in shared rooms with a document edited via compare-and-swap optimistic concurrency, plus a chat channel and change deltas.301 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA persistent, conflict-aware memory MCP server for AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code).-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Nyxdoc, a document system where humans and external agents collaborate on documents with version history, agent to-dos, and workspace permissions.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: register sets up identity, claim acquires exclusive access, release relinquishes it, status checks availability, and wait blocks for availability. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each step in the coordination workflow.
All tools follow a consistent 'agenthold_' prefix with descriptive action names (register, claim, release, status, wait) in snake_case. This pattern is uniform across all five tools, providing predictability and readability without any deviations or mixed conventions.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of agent coordination and resource locking. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations: setup (register), acquisition (claim), release (release), checking (status), and waiting (wait). This count is neither too sparse nor bloated, fitting the domain perfectly.
The tool set provides complete coverage for the agent coordination domain, covering the full lifecycle from registration to resource management. There are no gaps: agents can register, claim, check status, wait, and release resources, enabling seamless workflow without dead ends or missing critical operations.