Random Quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description is the sole source of behavioral information. While 'Get' implies read-only, the description does not disclose side effects, randomness guarantees, return format, or any rate limits. It remains minimal and does not go beyond the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that begins with the core action 'Get a random quote' and then adds the optional filtering. It is concise, well-structured, and free of redundant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with three optional parameters and no output schema, the description is reasonably complete but lacks key context such as the return type (single quote vs. array), any pagination, or behavior when no filter matches. Given the absence of an output schema, the description should specify the response shape, which it does not.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for each parameter (100% coverage), and the description repeats that they are optional filters. It adds little beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate. No additional meaning is provided about value formats or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: it retrieves a random quote, with optional filters. The verb 'Get' and resource 'random quote' are specific, and the mention of filtering distinguishes it from simple retrieval tools like list_quotes or deletion tools like delete_quote.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when to prefer this over search_quotes or list_quotes, nor does it indicate exclusivity or prerequisites. The agent is left to infer appropriateness from the name and sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.