onenote_move_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond the annotations by disclosing a critical side effect: the moved page gets a NEW object ID and the old ID becomes invalid. It also directs the agent to use the returned page_id for further operations, which is exactly the kind of behavioral context needed to avoid stale references.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loads the primary action, and uses the second sentence for the most important caveat. There is no redundant or vague wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation tool with no output schema, the description covers the most important contextual element (ID invalidation) and mentions the returned page_id. It could also describe error conditions or the full response format, but the critical information is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides 100% coverage with clear descriptions for both page_id and target_section_id. The description adds no additional parameter-level detail, so it does not improve on the schema's baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Move') and resource ('page') with a clear destination ('another section'), making the tool's function unambiguous. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like onenote_move_section (moves a section) and onenote_reorder_pages (reorders within a section).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the action plainly but does not explicitly say when to use this tool instead of alternatives such as onenote_move_section or onenote_reorder_pages. The appropriate usage is implied by the tool name and first sentence, but there is no explicit when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.