notebooklm-py-diet-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to notebooklm-py-diet-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Google NotebookLM, including listing and managing notebooks and sources, asking grounded questions with citations, and generating audio overviews, briefings, quizzes, and mind maps.13MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Google NotebookLM for grounded, hallucination-free answers through notebook management, source management, research, and generation tools.29218 npm43MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query and interact with Google NotebookLM notebooks to retrieve citation-backed information. It provides tools for listing notebooks, accessing source data, and asking natural language questions.11-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to query and manage private Google NotebookLM notebooks with grounded citations, source and note operations, and secure credential containment.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to programmatically access and control Google NotebookLM, supporting operations like notebook management, source addition, audio generation, and more via natural language.39MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Google NotebookLM to create notebooks, add sources (PDF, URL, YouTube), and ask questions with citations.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Tools generally have distinct purposes, but generate_and_download and export_artifact both deal with artifacts, and list_sources vs list_artifacts could be confused. Most tools are clearly separated.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but there are inconsistencies like 'list_notebooks_tool' with a '_tool' suffix, 'research_and_import' uses 'and', and 'pdf_to_png' lacks a verb. Overall patterns are mixed.
14 tools is well-scoped for a NotebookLM server, covering notebook management, sources, Q&A, artifacts, accounts, and PDF utilities. No obvious bloat or deficiency.
Core workflows (create/list notebooks, add sources, ask questions, generate/export artifacts, account management) are covered. Minor gaps like missing delete/update operations do not significantly hinder typical use.