notebooklm-py-diet-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to notebooklm-py-diet-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Google NotebookLM, including listing and managing notebooks and sources, asking grounded questions with citations, and generating audio overviews, briefings, quizzes, and mind maps.13MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Google NotebookLM for grounded, hallucination-free answers through notebook management, source management, research, and generation tools.29528 npm34MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query and interact with Google NotebookLM notebooks to retrieve citation-backed information. It provides tools for listing notebooks, accessing source data, and asking natural language questions.11-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to programmatically access and control Google NotebookLM, supporting operations like notebook management, source addition, audio generation, and more via natural language.39MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Google NotebookLM to create notebooks, add sources (PDF, URL, YouTube), and ask questions with citations.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to programmatically interact with Google NotebookLM, allowing them to create and manage notebooks, add sources, query content, generate audio/video, and perform research tasks through natural language commands.24915,448 PyPI6,096MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Tools generally have distinct purposes, but generate_and_download and export_artifact both deal with artifacts, and list_sources vs list_artifacts could be confused. Most tools are clearly separated.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but there are inconsistencies like 'list_notebooks_tool' with a '_tool' suffix, 'research_and_import' uses 'and', and 'pdf_to_png' lacks a verb. Overall patterns are mixed.
14 tools is well-scoped for a NotebookLM server, covering notebook management, sources, Q&A, artifacts, accounts, and PDF utilities. No obvious bloat or deficiency.
Core workflows (create/list notebooks, add sources, ask questions, generate/export artifacts, account management) are covered. Minor gaps like missing delete/update operations do not significantly hinder typical use.