Skip to main content
Glama
e1imba

Project Customization MCP

by e1imba
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Project Customization MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • devflow-mcp

      boranesn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that provides AI assistants with comprehensive GitHub developer tooling including PR analysis, code review, changelog generation, dependency auditing, commit summarization, and refactoring suggestions.
      11 npm
      ISC

    • DevForge-MCP

      Sanket2329
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to intelligently understand, analyze, edit, navigate, and review software projects with multi-workspace support, Git integration, and semantic search.
      1
      MIT

    • code-review-mcp

      AlanNiew
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides local code quality analysis for AI coding assistants, supporting file analysis, git diff review, and full project scanning with quality scoring.
      4
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    analyze_project and get_customization_recommendations both surface customization opportunities, creating some overlap. However, generate_copilot_instructions and update_readme clearly target distinct output files, and the descriptions help distinguish the intended use cases.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools use consistent snake_case verb_noun naming: analyze_project, generate_copilot_instructions, update_readme, and get_customization_recommendations. The verbs are clear and the pattern is predictable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a project customization utility, covering analysis, generation, updating, and recommendations without bloat or excessive thinness. Each tool has a distinct role in the workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers analysis, copilot instruction generation, README updates, and recommendations, but there is no tool to actually create or update VS Code settings or extensions files. This leaves a notable dead end for the settings-customization part of the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources