Skip to main content
Glama
dzulfiikar

human-loop-mcp

by dzulfiikar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to human-loop-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ping Principal MCP

      willwillems
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to request human input through native macOS dialogs for clarifying questions and user interactions.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • Implore MCP

      kerodkibatu
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through interactive GUI dialogs with quiz-style questions, supporting multiple choice and free-form responses for clarification, decisions, and knowledge extraction.
      1
      -

    • Clarify MCP Server

      ifmelate
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask clarification questions and receive structured user input through a Human-in-the-Loop interface.
      1
      MIT

    • DynamicAgent2UI

      iorcunyilmaz
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to render native-looking floating dialogs and forms on the user's desktop, capturing user interactions like button clicks and form inputs.
      -

    • AskMeMCP

      thlandgraf
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through a web interface, allowing them to pause execution and wait for responses via interactive tools like single questions, multiple choice selections, hypothesis challenges, and decision workflows.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: showing info, getting input, getting a choice, confirming, explaining usage, and health check. No overlaps.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or noun_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., show_info_message, get_user_input, health_check). No deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    6 tools is well-scoped for a human-in-the-loop server, covering core interaction types without bloat or insufficiency.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the essential human-loop interactions: informational display, single-line input, choice selection, confirmation, plus a meta tool and health check. No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources