Retrieve the highest version number recorded in your changelog to track release progress.
Liest die aktuelle höchste Versionsnummer aus dem Changelog.
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "get_current_version"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.1.8Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description only states the basic function but does not disclose any behavioral nuances such as what happens if the changelog is empty, whether it returns a string or number, or any error conditions. With no annotations, this is insufficient for full transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence that quickly conveys the tool's purpose with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the description covers the core function, it lacks information about prerequisites (like changelog existence), the format of the returned version number, and potential error states. Given the simplicity, it is partially complete but not fully informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the schema fully covers parameter semantics. The description does not need to add anything, achieving high value by being unnecessary.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool reads the current highest version number from the changelog, using a specific verb and resource, and implicitly distinguishes from sibling tools like get_entry or get_next_version.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit usage context or alternatives are mentioned; the description only states what it does without indicating when it should be preferred over siblings like get_next_version or search_changelog.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.