roshan-alefba-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to roshan-alefba-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA self-hostable MCP server for Roshan AI's Persian speech service, Harf, enabling transcription, forced alignment, real-time streaming, and speaker analysis through natural language.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that extracts text-layer content from PDF files, enabling AI agents to inspect, extract text, outlines, and page content.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA macOS-based MCP server that enables high-accuracy text extraction from PDF and image files using the OwlOCR app or Apple's Vision Framework. It supports multi-language OCR and provides asynchronous tools for processing documents directly within MCP clients.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants read and visually analyze local documents — PDFs, Excel spreadsheets, CSV files, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, and images.442 npm53 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that extracts clean text, tables, and structured data from documents, images, code, and audio files, supporting 97 formats with OCR, transcription, and code intelligence.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA universal MCP server for document processing, conversion, and automation. Handle PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, and more through a unified API and toolset.1316 npm139MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose; even the four read-document variants are distinguished by method (URL, callback, upload, pages). Persian and English descriptions reinforce uniqueness.
Most tools follow 'alefba_verb_noun' (e.g., delete_document), but some use 'alefba_noun_verb' (e.g., document_status) and three tools (healthcheck, list_instances, roshan_alefba_docs) lack the 'alefba_' prefix, breaking the pattern.
17 tools cover the full OCR document lifecycle—upload, read, status, download, delete—plus instance management and docs. Slightly above the typical ideal range but justifiable for the feature set.
The tool surface is comprehensive: multiple read modes, format-specific downloads, async result polling, healthcheck, instance listing, and documentation. No obvious gaps for document processing.