Skip to main content
Glama
duolabmeng6

Interactive Feedback MCP

by duolabmeng6
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Interactive Feedback MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-feedback-collector

      sanshao85
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback with text and image support via a modern GUI.
      234
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      favtony
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -

    • gpt-image-mcp

      naporin0624
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI-powered image generation using OpenAI's gpt-image-1 and gpt-image-2 models with advanced text rendering and native transparency support.
      43 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility for ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as requesting interactive feedback for a project directory and summary, leaving no room for confusion with other tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'interactive_feedback' follows a clear snake_case pattern with a descriptive verb-noun structure. Since there is only one tool, consistency is inherently perfect with no deviations or mixed conventions to evaluate.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and scope. While it might suffice for a very narrow task like interactive feedback, it feels thin and lacks the breadth typically expected for an MCP server, which often handles multiple related operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface is minimal, covering only the core action of requesting feedback. However, for a domain focused on interactive feedback, there are notable gaps—such as tools for managing feedback sessions, retrieving past feedback, or updating feedback—that could hinder agent workflows and create dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources